Welcome to Plastory!

Free delivery over $200
Money back guarantee
Weekly new arrivals
befurniturestore2-header-icon4
Fast delivery
befurniturestore2-header-icon3
Quality assurance

composite decking comparison 2017

Explore the top composite decking materials of 2017 in this detailed comparison article, featuring reviews and ratings for brands like Trex, Fiberon, and AZEK.

Composite Decking Comparison 2017

Introduction

In 2017, composite decking materials continued to gain popularity as homeowners sought low-maintenance, durable alternatives to traditional wood decks. This article provides an in-depth analysis comparing the performance, cost, maintenance, and aesthetics of leading composite decking brands available in 2017. We’ll explore the pros and cons of each brand, user reviews, and expert opinions to help you make an informed decision.

Performance and Durability

Composite decking materials are known for their durability and resistance to moisture, insects, and rot. In 2017, popular brands like Trex, Fiberon, and TimberTech led the market with innovative designs and high-performance features. For instance, Trex’s Transcend line featured advanced UV protection and stain resistance, making it a top choice for homeowners seeking long-lasting beauty. Similarly, Fiberon’s Horizon series boasted superior strength and weather resistance, thanks to its proprietary SolidCore technology.

Cost Analysis

The cost of composite decking varies significantly depending on the brand and specific product. Generally, premium brands like Trex and Fiberon tend to be more expensive upfront but offer better value over time due to their longevity and reduced maintenance needs. In 2017, the average cost per square foot ranged from $3.50 to $8.00, with premium options reaching upwards of $10.00. While this may seem steep compared to traditional wood, the overall cost savings from lower maintenance requirements often justifies the initial investment.

Maintenance Requirements

One of the primary advantages of composite decking is its minimal maintenance requirements. Unlike wood, composite materials do not require regular sealing or staining. However, they still benefit from occasional cleaning and inspection to ensure longevity. In 2017, brands like Trex and Fiberon offered detailed care instructions and warranties that guaranteed their products against fading, staining, and structural damage for extended periods. Regular cleaning with mild soap and water was sufficient for most composite decks, making them ideal for busy homeowners.

Aesthetics and Design Options

Composite decking has come a long way in terms of aesthetic appeal. In 2017, manufacturers introduced a wide range of colors, textures, and styles to mimic the look of natural wood while offering enhanced durability. Brands like Trex and Fiberon invested heavily in research and development to create realistic wood grain patterns and vibrant color options. This allowed homeowners to achieve the desired look without compromising on quality or longevity. For example, Trex’s Enhance line featured a unique wood grain texture that closely resembled real wood, while Fiberon’s Horizon series offered a smooth surface with subtle wood grain details.

User Reviews and Expert Opinions

According to numerous user reviews, Trex consistently ranked among the top choices for composite decking in 2017. Homeowners praised its durability, low maintenance requirements, and attractive appearance. However, some users reported minor issues with fading or warping over time, especially in extreme weather conditions. Fiberon also received positive feedback for its robust construction and variety of design options. Experts noted that both brands offered excellent warranties and customer support, making them reliable long-term investments.

Conclusion

When choosing the best composite decking material in 2017, factors such as performance, cost, maintenance, and aesthetics should all be considered. Leading brands like Trex, Fiberon, and TimberTech provided outstanding options that met these criteria. While there were slight differences in price and features, all three brands delivered high-quality, durable products that stood out in the market. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual preferences and budget constraints.

Reference

Trex Official Website

Fiberon Official Website

TimberTech Official Website

Baoding Plastroy WPC Products

 


Co-extruded WPC Decking Colors
Co-extruded WPC Decking Colors

 

Co-extruded WPC Decking Photo
Co-extruded WPC Decking Photo

 

Plastory Composite Decking Packing
Plastory Composite Decking Packing

Why Choose Plastory?

Baoding Plastory New Materials Co., Ltd. is a manufacturer of decorative materials with over 9 years of experience and 56 separate production lines.

Currently, our annual production exceeds 30,000 tons, with products exported to more than 50 countries worldwide.

Plastory is the drafting unit of the WPC National Standards and has obtained certifications such as REACH, ASTM, CE, and FSC. Plastory is dedicated to maintaining consistent quality, focusing on details, and prioritizing customer satisfaction.

Our factory is located in Baoding, Hebei Province, China, with a prime location and convenient transportation access. Baoding is approximately a 1.5-hour drive from Beijing Capital International Airport and just 2 hours away from Tianjin Port, making it easy for global clients to visit and facilitating efficient shipping of goods. Our facility spans a large area, equipped with advanced production equipment and modern testing facilities to ensure that every batch of products meets the highest quality standards.

We warmly welcome clients from around the world to visit our factory, where you can see our production processes firsthand and experience our product quality. Please feel free to reach out to us—we are committed to providing you with the best products and services.

Kindly get in touch with us to request a product catalogue.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “composite decking comparison 2017”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *